HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegister

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
08 September, 2010, 11:48:38 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search

Messages From ClinTools
Welcome to our support forum. Should you have any questions regarding the ClinTools software or any general comments / questions regarding the stats we use you've come to the right place. Members can post, guests can view. Membership is free and just needs an authenticating email address. Register and you'll be up and running in moments.

News
Windows Vista now supported!

Stats
96 Posts in 27 Topics by 29 Members
Latest Member: ivobsuth
+  ClinTools Software
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: 21 July, 2010, 06:47:19 PM 
Started by Dev - Last post by Dev
I've just had a question that I think others may benefit from seeing the answer. Here's what it said:

Quote
Hi there,
We are interested in purchasing the Effect Size Generator Pro in order to conduct a meta-analysis. We have downloaded the free version and we see that there are a limited number of categories in the database (e.g., study ID, study name, year of study, etc). We are wondering whether we can add more columns to the spreadsheet as we are interested in testing for moderators, or specific elements of the study.
Please let us know if this is possible.
Best,

Here's my answer:

Dear xxx,

There are a few ways of doing what you want but I'm not sure that all of them are easy (maybe even a little cumbersome). If you get a *.met file (let's call it metaanalysis1.met) and enter data you can put many elements from the same study into the file but under the 'include' heading change it to YES or NO (just write over) depending upon whether you want to include that element (i.e., that row) in the meta-analysis. I save the file under a new name before making any changes this way and it means I don't have to change back the yes and no's for each analysis (i.e., I keep a different .met file for each analysis).

If you want to include more columns, however, then you will need to export it as a microsoft access file (e.g., metaanalysis2.mdb) and work with it in Access. However, make sure you don't re-order the columns (you can add columns to the right though) and when it comes to wanting to work with the Effect Size Generator again, you'll need to cut-off those extra columns away and then just rename the file from, say, metaanalysis2.mdb to metaanalysis3.met (simply just rename the file and open it as normal).

Hope this helps,

Dev

 2 
 on: 08 June, 2010, 06:48:19 PM 
Started by Jemma - Last post by Dev
Hi Jemma,

Yes, Clintools uses the RCI of Jacobson & Truax. If you open the 'Contents' heading under "Help" on the RCC Generator task bar you will find all the formula used in the programme. Also, the 'About' box (also under "Help") gives a short summary.  Grin

Best

Dev

 3 
 on: 08 June, 2010, 03:10:40 PM 
Started by Jemma - Last post by Jemma
Hi there

Could someone clarify something for me? There are many different ways of calculating RCI (e.g. Jacobson & Truax - classical approach, or Christensen & Mendoza - taking into account practice effects, and many more) and I was wondering exactly how does ClinTools calculate RCI? Any help would be greatly appreciated!! Is the formula ClinTools uses available?

Thank you kindly
Anita

 4 
 on: 12 March, 2010, 12:58:52 AM 
Started by ssimpson - Last post by ssimpson
Hi Dev
It is the Young Schema Inventory (YSQ-L2).  I have looked high and low and found test-retest scores for all the subscales but not a global test-retest score.  That is a good idea to do our own test-retest calculation.  Maybe we could try that,
thanks again
Susan

Hi again Susan,

What's the measure, just in case one of us knows of a test-retest for it? Otherwise, you may have to run a small sample of 'norms' over a two week period and get the test-retest?

Best,
Dev

 5 
 on: 10 March, 2010, 03:15:27 AM 
Started by ssimpson - Last post by Dev
Hi again Susan,

What's the measure, just in case one of us knows of a test-retest for it? Otherwise, you may have to run a small sample of 'norms' over a two week period and get the test-retest?

Best,
Dev

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Page created in 0.125 seconds with 17 queries.
Amber design by Bloc | XHTML | CSS